MarkT

SoundClick Now!

"Christian Anti-Intellectualism" - William Lane Craig

{ 6:04 PM, 7/2/2010 } { Posted in Christianity } { 0 comments } { Link }
William Lane Craig, in his article, Advice to Christian Apologists writes, "Charles Malik, the former Lebanese ambassador to the United States, in his address at the inauguration of the Billy Graham center at Wheaton College, warned American Christians of the danger of anti-intellectualism. He asked
pointedly,

Who among evangelicals can stand up to the great secular scholars on their own terms of scholarship? Who among evangelical scholars is quoted as a normative source by the greatest secular authorities on history or philosophy or psychology or sociology or politics? Does the evangelical mode
of thinking have the slightest chance of becoming the dominant mode in the great universities of Europe and America that stamp our entire civilization with their spirit and ideas?

Malik went on to say,

It will take a different spirit altogether to overcome this great danger of anti-intellectualism. For example, I say this different spirit, so far as philosophy alone--the most important domain for thought and intellect--is concerned, must see the tremendous value of spending an entire year doing nothing but poring intensely over the Republic or the Sophist of Plato, or two years over the Metaphysics or the Ethics of Aristotle, or three years over the City of God of Augustine. But if a start is made now on a crash
program in this and other domains, it will take at least a century to catch up with the Harvards and Tübingens and the Sorbonnes-and by then where will these universities be? For the sake of greater effectiveness in witnessing to Jesus Christ, as well as for their own sakes, evangelicals cannot afford
to keep on living on the periphery of responsible intellectual existence."

from
http://abetterhope.blogspot.com/2008/07/christian-anti-intellectualism.html



Christian anti-intellecualism

{ 6:01 PM, 7/2/2010 } { Posted in Christianity } { 0 comments } { Link }

Anti-Intellectualism

Anti-Intellectualism in the Western World

Anti-intellectualism is a disposition to discount the importance of truth and the life of the mind.
-Os Guinness

We live in what may be the most anti-intellectual period in the history of Western civilization. . . . We must have passion-indeed hearts on fire for the things of God. But that passion must resist with intensity the
anti-intellectual spirit of the world.
-R. C. Sproul

The result of all this is that Americans are the best entertained and quite likely the least well-informed people in the Western world.
-Neil Postman

Anti-Intellectualism in Evangelicalism

I must be frank with you: the greatest danger confronting American evangelical Christianity is the danger of anti-intellectualism. The mind in its greatest and deepest reaches is not cared for enough.
-Charles Malik, Former President of the United Nations General Assembly

The scandal of the evangelical mind is that there is not much of an evangelical mind.
-Mark Noll

We speak of "the modern mind" and of "the scientific mind," using that word mind of a collectively accepted set of notions and attitudes. On the pattern of such usage I have positied a Christian Mind, chiefly for the purpose of showing it does not exist. . . . There is no Christian mind. . . . the Christian Mind has succumbed to the secular drift with a degree of weakness unmatched in Christian History.
-Harry Blamires

The contemporary Christian mind is starved, and as a result we have small, impoverished souls.
-J. P. Moreland

Anti-Intellectualism Is No Virtue

God is no fonder of intellectual slackers than of any other slackers.
-C. S. Lewis

At root, evangelical anti-intellectualism is both a scandal and a sin. It is a scandal in the sense of being an offense and a stumbling block that needlessly hinders serious people from considering the Christian faith and coming to Christ. It is a sin because it is a refusal, contrary to Jesus' two great commandments, to love the Lord our God with our minds. Anti-intellectualism is quite simply a sin. Evangelicals must address it as such, beyond all excuses, evasions, or rationalizations of false piety.
-Os Guinness

Anti-Intellectualism Is a Hindrance to the Gospel

False ideas are the greatest obstacles to the reception of the gospel.
-J. Gresham Machen

Towards a Solution to Anti-Intellectualism

The Christian religion flourishes not in the darkness but in the light. Intellectual slothfulness is but a quack remedy for unbelief; the true remedy is consecration of intellectual power to the service of the Lord Jesus Christ.
-J. Gresham Machen

http://thegospelcoalition.org/blogs/justintaylor/2006/10/06/anti-intellectualism/



Pre-Easter Jesus (The historic Jesus) / Post-Easter Jesus (Christ of Faith)

{ 5:59 PM, 7/2/2010 } { Posted in Jesus of Nazareth } { 0 comments } { Link }
Pre-Easter Jesus / Post-Easter Jesus

4 B.C.E. to 30 C.E. / 30 C.E. to present
Corporeal, human being of flesh and blood Spiritual / non-material reality
Finite and mortal / Infinite, eternal
Human / Divine
A Jewish peasant / King of Kings and Lord of Lords
Figure of the past / Figure of the present
Jesus of Nazareth / Jesus Christ
Monotheistic Jew / Becomes the second person of the trinity, "God with a human face"
Galilean Jew of the first century / "The Face of God" (metaphor based on 2 Cor. 4:6)

From http://www.united.edu/portrait/compare.shtml


Last Judgement: Michelangelo

{ 5:57 PM, 7/2/2010 } { Posted in The Arts } { 0 comments } { Link }
To return to the Last Judgement: Michelangelo had already finished more than three~fourths of the work when Pope Paul went to see it. On this occasion Biagio da Cesena, the master of ceremonies and a very high-minded person, happened to be with the Pope in the chapel and was asked what he thought of the painting. He answered that it was most disgraceful that in so sacred a place there should have been depicted all those nude figures, exposing themselves so shamefully, and that it was no work for a papal chapel but rather for the public baths and taverns. Angered by this comment, Michelangelo determined he would have his revenge; and as soon as Biagio had left he drew his portrait frorn memory in the figure of Minos, shown with a great serpent curled around his legs, among a heap of devils in hell; nor for all his pleading with the Pope and Michelangelo could Biagio have the figure removed, and it was left, to record the incident, as it is today.

from Vasari's "Lives of The Artists" (Translated by George Bull, Penguin; Middlesex, England: 1965; p. 379)

BRIEF HISTORY OF THE APOCALYPSE

{ 5:54 PM, 7/2/2010 } { Posted in Prophecy } { 0 comments } { Link }
 BRIEF HISTORY OF THE APOCALYPSE - SOON!

from http://www.abhota.info/endsoon.htm

Unlike those daring prophets that set a date or time window for the End, many doomsayers hedge their bets by not gambling on a particular date, but  instead merely insist that the end is coming SOON! This of course renders their prophecies untestable, but at the same time scary enough to bamboozle
the gullible into believing them. SOON! has a nebulous quality about it: it  could mean tomorrow, next year, or even a million yeas from now, long after the prophet and his followers are no longer around to lose face.

~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

A BRIEF HISTORY OF THE APOCALYPSE - FUTURE

from http://www.abhota.info/end6.htm

2010  The final year according to the Hermetic Order of the Golden Dawn. (Shaw p.223)

2011  Another possible date for Earth's entry into the Photon Belt. (See the May 5, 1997 entry)

Dec 31, 2011  In an interesting parallel to the Harmonic Convergence concept, Solara Antara Amaa-ra, leader of the "11:11 Doorway" movement, claims that there's a "doorway of opportunity" lasting from January 11, 1992 to December 31, 2011 in which humanity is given the final chance to rid itself of evil and attain a higher level of consciousness, or doom will strike. (Wojcik p.206)

2012  James T. Harmon's Rapture prediction #3. (Oropeza p.89)

Dec 21, 2012  Terence McKenna combines Mayan chronology with a New Age pseudoscience called Novelty Theory to conclude that the collision an asteroid or some "trans-dimensional object" with the Earth, or alien contact, or a solar explosion, or the transformation of the Milky Way into a quasar, or some other "ultranovel" event will occur on this day. Anyway, something is supposed to happen, and he has lots of pseudoscientific gobbledygook to back up his thesis.

Dec 23, 2012  The world to end, according to the ancient Mayan calendar. (Abanes p.342)

2017  The "Prophet Gabriel" supposedly told the Sword of God Brotherhood that the "dying time" will come in 2017, and only members of the cult will survive. Everyone else will "perish in hellfire."

Sep 28, 2020  George Madray predicts a Yom Kippur Parousia in 2020. (McIver #2854)

2022  James T. Harmon's Rapture prediction #4. (Oropeza p.89)

2023  Ian Gurney predicts in his book The Cassandra Prophecy - Armageddon Approaches that the "final date, Judgement Day, the end of mankind's time on this planet, is less than twenty two years away" from 2001, which means that the world is set to end by 2023 at the very latest.

2025  In this post, Georgann Chenault, a frequent poster on Usenet, wrote "I think the rapture of the church will be before 2025."

Nov 13, 2026  According to an article published in Science magazine in 1960, this was the date that the world's population would reach infinity. (Source: Jacksonville.com)

2033  Believed by many to by the 2000th anniversary of the Crucifixion, this is a date just begging to be targeted by doomsayers whose prophecies for 2000 and 2001 will have failed.

2035  The Raëlians are working hard to establish an embassy in Jerusalem in anticipation of the 2035 arrival of aliens called "elohim", who will usher in a New Age. However, their arrival is contingent on the
completion of the embassy. (Robbins p.164)

2037  In her book The Call to Glory, psychic Jeane Dixon wrote, "The years 2020-2037, approximately, hail the true Second Coming of Christ." The Battle of Armageddon is to take place in 2020. (Dixon p.170, 172)

2040
a.. Pyramidologist Max Toth predicts the physical reincarnation of Jesus Christ occurring in 2040. Like other pyramidologists, he used thedimensions of the Great Pyramid's passageways to predict future events. (Weber p.195)
b.. John Smart of Singularity Watch estimates that a "technological singularity" will take place around the year 2040, when technological advancement reaches asymptotic levels. After this apocalyptic event, a new  era of balance and compassion will begin.

ca. 4,500,000,000 AD  The sun will swell into a red giant star, swallowing Mercury, Venus, Earth, and perhaps Mars. This will be the true end of the world!



A Psychological Analysis of Fundamentalism

{ 5:48 PM, 7/2/2010 } { Posted in Fundamentalism } { 0 comments } { Link }

A Psychological Analysis of Fundamentalism

Fundamentalism is a religious movement, a theological & philosophical stand, a political and social force. I regard it most basically as a particular variety of psychological development. Fundamentalists of all religious and political varieties share the same character traits. It is the psychological
character of the fundamentalist that is at the root of the ideological interpretation termed "fundamentalism," not an intellectual or spiritual concept.

"Fundamentalist" is a term sometimes used to refer to anyone who is intolerant of other's beliefs. Fundamentalism is "not so much an ideology as  it is an attitude, an attitude of intolerance, incivility and narrowness," says Walter Shurden, professor of Christianity and director of the Center for Baptist Studies at Mercer University. "It is an attitude that says, 'We have the truth, the whole truth and nothing but the truth, and we are going to impose it on you and control the system so that you will have to knuckle under to it.'" As anyone who has ever attended a meeting of two or more activists can attest, that attitude can be found at all points on the political and religious spectrum.

There are, however, specific traits to what can be called "right wing" fundamentalism (of any religion) that what is sometimes called "left wing fundamentalism" lacks: authoritarianism, sexual guilt, and attitudes toward women and homosexuals.

Psychological traits of fundamentalism:

a.. A strictly hierarchical and authoritarian worldview. Everything has to have a First, a Somebody in Charge. In any partnership, one partner has to have the deciding vote. Groups and societies work best with rigidly defined roles and stratifications. (There are people who believe this way who are not fundamentalists: at least, not religious fundamentalists.)

b.. Ethical development at the "reward and punishment" stage: morality must be defined and enforced by an external authority.

c.. A lot of guilt and fear about sex.

d.. Basic distrust of human beings; certainty that "uncontrolled," human beings will be bad and vicious, particularly in sexual ways.

e.. Low tolerance for ambiguity. Everything must be clear cut, black and white. Nothing can be "possibly true but unproven at this time, we're still studying it." Fundamentalists regard science as flawed precisely because science changes. (A striking characteristic of fundamentalists is that their
response to any setback which may instill doubt is to step up evangelizing for converts.)

f.. Literalism, usually including a limited sense of humor.

g.. Distrust of their own judgment, or any other human being's judgment.

h.. Fear of the future. The driving motivation of fundamentalism appears to outsiders to be fear that oneself or the group one identifies with is losing power and prerequisites and is in danger from others who are gaining power. This is not how fundamentalists put it.

i.. A low self-esteem that finds satisfaction in being one of the Elect, superior to all others. It seems to be particularly rewarding to know that rich people have a real hard time getting into Heaven.

The life experience of fundamentalist that seems to encourage these traits include:

a.. Conditional love: parents, or other authority figures, withheld love to control behavior.

b.. Other factors -- sometimes mental, emotional, or even physical abuse -- that minimized self-esteem.

c.. For those who grew up fundamentalist, the church was the central activity of family life, all else was subsidiary to the church, and social interaction with "non-believers" was discouraged, except when evangelizing.

d.. Those who have converted to fundamentalism often grew up without any firm philosophical framework, or experienced some trauma that destroyed their former framework. They were at a time in their lives when they needed absolute Answers.

Fundamentalist groups reinforce these traits:

a.. They insist on a rigid hierarchy of authority. The more extreme the group, the more authority is concentrated in one central figure.

b.. The group, and the authority figure(s) within the group, withhold or bestow love to control behavior. Misbehaving members are cut off from communication.

c.. They magnify current social and individual evils and dwell on the "innate wickedness of man."

d.. Sexual "immorality" is often their central cause.

e.. They promote a Truth which is superior to all other truths because it is absolute and unchanging.

f.. They promote distrust of one's personal judgment, being subject instead to the given truths of the group, the judgment of the church as a body, or the proclamations of a central authority figure.

g.. They are apocalyptic, foretelling an immanent and horrifying future which only the faithful will survive. Any disaster in the news is magnified as "a sign of the apocalypse.

The Alternative to Fundamentalism

Regardless of belief system, an individual is no longer a "fundamentalist" when one develops:

a.. An unconditional self-esteem and (usually in consequence) an unconditional love of others.

b.. A tolerance -- even enjoyment -- of ambiguity and diverse beliefs. One can cheerfully live with the fact that one's neighbor on one side believes that his little blue pickup truck is God and one's neighbor on the other side doesn't believe in God at all, and feel no compulsion to convert either of them. One is not frightened to question one's faith or explore alternatives.

c.. Free social and intellectual interaction with others, beyond -- or even without -- evangelism.

d.. A trust that one can "figure things out," along with a willingness to learn from others and to change one's mind.

e.. A faith that whatever the fluctuations in life and society, things can and will get better. A feeling of personal responsibility and resolve to make it so.

f.. A sense of humor.

It is not necessary to abandon all personal faith and beliefs in order to be tolerant of others. The majority of the followers in any of the world's religions are able to hold a strong personal belief and not feel threatened that others hold different beliefs.

How does anyone ever become an ex-fundamentalist? Any or all of these factors seem effective:

a.. Relationships with "non-believers" who become emotionally valued.

b.. Intellectual process: a build-up of contradictions between taught morality and the behavior of church authorities and members; unresolved questions in study of the Bible; what is taught about the world vs
observation.

c.. Receiving unconditional love and acceptance from a non-fundamentalist.

d.. A strengthened self-esteem, with the loss of the need for others to be Wrong.

e.. A spiritual epiphany, with a new faith that one's relationship with God is not conditional on "perfect" faith or behavior, that it can grow and change.

from http://anitra.net/activism/fundamentalism/psychology.html



{ Last Page } { Page 1 of 2 } { Next Page }

About Me

Home
My Profile
Archives
Friends
My Photo Album
Podcast Files

«  March 2010  »
MonTueWedThuFriSatSun
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
293031 

SoundClick Now!

Links

Bruce Cockburn
U2 Propaganda
Bob Dylan
Early Christian Writings
Sacred Texts Archive
Jewish Texts & Torah
Rowland Croucher
Psychology of Religion
No Answers In Genesis
Ship of Fools
Skeptics Annotated Bible
Five Gospel Parallels & Paul
Christian Urban Legends
John Shelby Spong
Philosophers Magazine
Marcus Borg
John Dominic Crossan
Landover Baptist (satire)
MY ORIGINAL MUSIC - Mark Tindall
Philosophy Of Religion
Philosophical Dictionary
Philosophy of Religion
Reference Desk
Noachide laws
Philosophers related to religion
Mary Hogan - Torah
Chumash
Jewish Encyclopedia
Jews For Judaism
MY SATIRICAL BLOG - Pastor Dale K Whangke - Wyrst Pentacostal Church, Maitland
Tanakh (Jewish Bible)
Interpreting Ancient Manuscripts
Normal Bob Smith
Pray For Satan's Salvation
Spiritual Abuse Recovery
Survivors of Spiritual Abuse
Association of Former Pentecostals
Encyclopedia of NT Textual Criticism
Victims Of The Christian Faith
Frank Schaeffer
Simply Jewish
Barbara Thiering
MY HUMOROUS BLOG Fundy Funhouse
Walter Brueggemann's 19 Theses
Jewish Birthday Calculator
History Of Religion
Gematriculator (Biblical Numerics or Kristyun Numerology?)
Refutations of Christianity’s Claims and Objections to Judaism
Bible History
God Checker
Centre For Progressive Christianity
DeChurched
Bono Online
World Religions Adherents
The Encyclopedia of New Testament Textual Criticism
Joseph Campbell
Justice For Larry Norman's son DANIEL
Early Jewish Writings
Five Gospels Parallels
Fowler's Stages Of Faith
Early Jewish Writings
TalkOrigins Archive
Religious Tolerance

Categories

Australia
Autobiographical
Bible Authorship
Bible Timeline
BLOG FAQ & Updates
Book
Censorship
Christianity
Church
Clergy
Creationism
Fundamentalism
God
Health
Holy Spirit
Homosexuality
Islam
Jesus of Nazareth
John's Gospel
Judaism
New Testament
News
Noachide
Old Testament
Paul
Philosophy
Prophecy
Sex
The Arts
The Devil

Recent Entries

In Defense of Avatar contra "pasta" Mark Driscoll
FAILED NEW TESTAMENT PROPHECIES
Ecclesiastes and Vanitas Art
Sacrifice is not required
Your god may be sleeping

Friends

rustylee
domaji
gerryjoeweise
gerryjoeweiseart
CassandraSchultz
Sarva
BrisbaneArtist
verbs
bonney30
XtabaysWorld
plonka
Hellsbells
vivienyan0220
tahnee
celiastartsnow
GoldCoastGirl
klarth
aprildujin
chazza
borisknack
jwfreeman
lampdesigner