Bible Believers' Newsletter #554
"We focus on the present Truth – what Jesus is doing now. . ."
ISSN 1442-8660
Christian greetings in the precious Name of our Lord Jesus Christ. We are pleased you could join us in fellowship around God's unchanging Word.
The Jews rejected Christ so they have no creative ability, only a destructive parasitical bent, that gives us their usurious banks, their morally degrading entertainment and their wars. Now the Gentiles have also rejected Christ, crucifying Him to themselves afresh, the world is going insane as reflected in our main article which invites careful reading rather than hasty browsing to identify The Trail of the Serpent since the Fall, "going to and fro in the Earth, and walking up and down in it" to accomplish Lucifer's Big Idea which is to incarnate himself in his people for one world government (Isaiah 14:12-17).
Our guest contributor, Scottish engineer Major C.H. Douglas (1879-1952), founded the modern monetary reform movement known as Social Credit. Douglas pointed out that modern industry can readily produce enough goods to meet the needs of everyone in society, but that the reason we sink further into debt, while at the same time we are driven to produce more and more, is because of the nature of industrial production combined with the monopoly on money-creation held by the banking system.
As he explained, "The method by which the banker makes money is ingenious, and consists very largely of bookkeeping. . . Every bank loan creates a deposit, the repayment of every bank loan destroys a deposit; the purchase of a security by a bank creates a deposit and the sale of a security by a bank destroys a deposit. There you have . . . a quite undeniable statement of where money comes from. All but 0.7 of one per cent (or over 99 per cent)".
"The love of money is the root of all evil." Although there is US$1.5 quadrillion in derivatives obligations outstanding, more than a hundred times the total money in the world, the 'hidden hand' is rigidly determined to maintain the fractional reserve banking system, collapsing the world monetary system and real economy to bring humanity into permanent debt slavery under the overwhelming power of law enforced by the colonial troops of the USSA (Revelation 13:11-18).
This Newsletter serves those of like precious faith. Whoever will receive the truth is welcome to feed their soul from the waters of the River of Life. Everything here presented should be confirmed personally in your own Bible.
Your brother-in-Christ, Anthony Grigor-Scott
Secret Plan for IMF World Dictatorship
November 10, 2008 This is not a new Bretton Woods in any sense, but rather a British-steered attempt to impose the dictatorship of the International Monetary Fund (IMF) on the entire planet, wiping out all hope of economic recovery, the modernization of the developing countries, and national sovereignty at the same time.
Under this plan, the IMF would dictate the economic policies of all states. The IMF orthodoxy is austerity, sacrifice, deregulation, privatization, union busting, wage reductions, free trade, the race to the bottom, and prohibitions on advanced technologies. These policies would strangle humanity.
The Brazil-Russia-India-China bloc is reportedly objecting to putting so much power into the hands of the IMF, which is dominated by the US and the British, with Prime Minister Gordon Brown and Treasury Secretary Paulson of Goldman Sachs laying down the party line.
The new Chinese economic measures are the opposite of the bankers' bailouts imposed so far in the wealthier countries. The Chinese will spend $585 billion on infrastructure, transportation, housing, and food production, with special attention to railroads, airports, and roads. The Chinese package is in the spirit of the Franklin D. Roosevelt New Deal, and it will maintain forward progress for China. The US $700 billion bailout and the UK and EU versions are a futile attempt to prop up the $1.5 quadrillion derivatives bubble. Sensible economic policy starts with wiping out the derivatives cancer.
The interest of humanity can only be served by preventing the Washington conference from carrying out the plan outlined below. If Russia, China, and the developing countries can mount an effective opposition, the world will divide into two blocs—a pro-derivatives, anti-production Malthusian-monetarist bloc, which will tend to fall behind because of its own policies; and, on the other hand, an anti-derivatives, pro-production bloc of nations seeking modern technology, and the full fruits of scientific and economic progress. Persons of good will in all nations are encouraged to mobilize to make sure that their own country joins the pro-production, anti-derivatives bloc. . . Full story: Webster Tarpley
Comment: Bible prophecy is being fulfilled. Three incestuous Luciferian factions are vying for world hegemony: Chatham House, the City of London/Black Nobility Webster Tarpley labels "British;" the Judaeo-Roman Catholic church, and Judaeo-Communism, as expounded in our four-part study on Revelation 17:12-13. This is nothing but the continuation of Lucifer's ancient conspiracy in Amschel Mayer Rothschild's plans for the Illuminati devised in 1773 and brought to fruition in 1776 by Adam Weishaupt. They describe what God foretold His prophets Zechariah, Daniel and John, but Rothschild's interpretation is carnal as it was based on the Talmud, Zohar and Cabbala. As successive leaders of the World Revolutionary Movement, Rothschild, Weishaupt, Moses Holbrook, Pike, Mazzini, Lemmi, Lenin, Manuilsky and Alister Crowley knew full well what God had foretold in His unchanging Word, but not having the Spirit, they misinterpreted the letter and turned the love of God into hate. The revolutionary activities of these men were financed by British, French, German and American International Banksters. Like Nimrod's usurers and the Money-Changers of Christ's day, today's International Bankers are tools or agents of the Illuminati.
We see these G20 meetings, which will reconvene in March 2009, a herald of the division of the world into three blocs as planned by the Protocols and announced by George Orwell in his novel, "1984." The City of London's banksters and the Black Nobility will not "cleave" with "the kings of the East" as will be seen in a brief World War III following the sinking of Los Angeles, the cleaving of the mount of Olives cleaves. The kings of the East and the King of the North will attack Jerusalem, and invade the USA. Rome will bring the peace and in union with the Banksters and Black Nobility of 'the City' establish their IMF's NWO. After three and a half years, Rome will break her agreement with the banksters who will side with Judaeo_Communism, destroying Vatican City State and North America thus ushering-in Armageddon.
The Great Depression of the 21st Century: Collapse of the Real Economy
November 15, 2008 – This crisis is far more serious than the Great Depression. All major sectors of the global economy are affected. Recent reports suggest that the system of Letters of Credit as well as international shipping, which constitute the lifeline of the international trading system, are potentially in jeopardy.
The proposed bank "bailout" under the so-called Troubled Asset Relief Program (TARP) is not a "solution" to the crisis but the "cause" of further collapse. The "bailout" contributes to a further process of destabilization of the financial architecture. It transfers large amounts of public money, at taxpayers expense, into the hands of private financiers. . . We are dealing with a long-term process of economic and financial restructuring. . . What is distinct in this particular phase of the crisis, is the ability of the financial giants (through their overriding control over credit) not only to create havoc in the production of goods and services, but also to undermine and destroy large corporate entities of the real economy. . .
Bankruptcies and foreclosures are a money-spinning operation. . . The financiers are on a shopping-spree. America's Forbes 400 billionaires are waiting in limbo. Once they have consolidated their position in the banking industry, the financial giants including JP Morgan Chase, Bank of America, et al will use their windfall money gains and bailout money provided under TARP, to further extend their control over the real economy.
The next step consists in transforming liquid assets, namely money paper wealth, into the acquisition of real economy assets. . . The money managers are picking up the pieces. . . The architects of financial disaster under the 1999 Gramm-Leach-Bliley Financial Services Modernization Act (FSMA) have been entrusted with the task of mitigating the crisis, which they themselves created. They are the cause of financial collapse.
The G20 Financial Summit doesn't question the legitimacy of the hedge funds and the various instruments of derivative trade. . . Barack Obama has embraced the Washington-Wall Street consensus. . . Full story: globalresearch.ca
Comment: The 'City of London' is directing the globalisation of poverty for Lucifer's totalitarian one world government. Destruction of the real or productive economy will give "power to Satan, the rider of the pale horse, over the fourth part of the earth, to kill with sword, and with hunger, and with death, and with the beasts of the earth" (Revelation 6:8).
Holocaust's Unholy Hold
Israel, November 16, 2008 – Even today, when economic storms are shaking markets around the world, posing a threat to the stability of entire countries and societies, Israel continues to conduct its business far from the turmoil, as if swimming in a private ocean of its own. . . To Israelis, these issues are mundane. What really matters here is the all-important spirit of Trauma, the true basis for so many of our country's life principles. . . Every threat or grievance of major or minor importance is dealt with automatically by raising the biggest argument of them all—the Shoah—and from that moment onward, every discussion is disrupted. . .
The Jewish existence was always directed upward. Not only toward our king and father in the heavens, but also our gaze upward was an answer to the great call of humanity; an answer of liberty in the times of enslavement in Egypt, an answer to the need of a righteous and egalitarian law in the days of Sinai when we wandered through the desert, an answer to the call of human universalism manifest in the Scriptures of the great prophets, and finally, an answer to the cry opposing unjust and imperial occupation throughout late antiquity.
COMMENT: That is the Jewish fantasy, conflating Jews with Israelites. The truth is that Jews have always been focused so intently, so exclusively, on themselves and their worldly concerns as to require them to compress matters of the wider reality into a kind of staged fantasy that readily accommodates the self-centered Jewish world view. Douglas Reed gave Jews the precisely correct advice when he suggested they join the human family—but can they, when their religion defines the human family as animals created in the image of Jews to serve Jews, and that the best of the non-Jews should be killed? (Talmud, Yebamoth 98a; Bereshith, 25a; Kiddushin 66c; Soferim 15, Rule 10).
Even the Zionist idea was not merely an attempt to rescue the Jews from violent anti-Semitic prosecutors, but rather was a heroic attempt to establish a model society. Zionism meant to create a society that avoided any form of discrimination or oppressive policy toward non-Jews, of the kind under which Jews had suffered for more than two millenniums. . .
COMMENT: Really! But, if the foregoing paragraph is correctly read, one can easily see the lie in it.
I have a vision of Israel as the driving force behind a global peace process and worldwide reconciliation and as a society guided by a deep sense of responsibility to world justice, but it's difficult to accept this vision when we are confronted every day with the hardship and perpetual bloodshed reflected in our newspapers. My hope is for a Jewish people that insists "never again"—not only for Jewish victims but for anyone who suffers around the globe today.
COMMENT: Burg seems to have no awareness of the atrocious destructiveness Jews have engineered to impose upon the non-Jewish world.
Full story: Former speaker of the Israeli parliament, Avraham Burg, is a businessman and author, most recently, of "The Holocaust Is Over; We Must Rise From Its Ashes," published this month by Palgrave Macmillan.
Hands Off Our Proposition! Religious Liberty at Stake!
Washington, November 14, 2008 – A new study by The Becket Fund for Religious Liberty has found that over 350 separate state anti-discrimination laws would likely be affected by the legal recognition of same-sex "marriage." The organization surveyed over 1,000 state anti-discrimination laws—specifically those prohibiting discrimination based on sexual orientation, gender, or marital status—to assess how those laws would affect religious dissenters to same-sex "marriage" if same-sex "marriage" were to be legally recognized. . .
Based on an analysis of the laws and what has transpired in other jurisdictions with similar laws, such as Canada, The Becket Fund warned: "Lawsuits will likely arise when religious people or religious organizations choose, based on their sincerely held religious beliefs, not to hire individuals in same-sex marriages, refuse to extend spousal benefits to same-sex spouses, refuse to make their property or services available for same-sex marriage ceremonies or other events affirming same-sex marriage, or refuse to provide otherwise available housing to same-sex couples. This wide-ranging conflict between governments and conscientious citizens would take years of litigation to resolve, assuming that it could be resolved". . . Full story: blogspot.com
On Sunday morning, amidst worshiping congregants . . . the Michigan left declared open war on peaceful church goers. . . with banners, chants, blasphemy, by storming the pulpit, by vandalizing the church facility, by potentially defiling the building with lewd, public, sex acts and by intentionally forcing physical confrontations with worshipers. . . This was the scene at a Bible believing church in Lansing, Michigan. Full story: rightmichigan.com
Comment: The Anti-Discrimination League of B'nai B'rith and their "useful idiots" working behind "hate" laws to divide and conquer (once) Christian host countries, would be powerless had our people not rejected "our strength and strong tower" of the Absolute of God's unchanging Word. For the law of the Lord is perfect, converting the soul: the testimony of the Lord is sure, making wise the simple" (Psalm 19:7; Isaiah 8:20; Matthew 4:4).
Programme for the Third World War
By Clifford Hugh Douglas
The present "financial meltdown" confirms history is pre-planned and that 'the City of London' still rules today: "Governments do not govern, but merely control the machinery of government, being themselves controlled by the hidden hand" — Benjamin Disraeli.
April, 1943 – The curious myopia (possibly resulting from the exoteric interpretation of Genesis which was supposed to indicate the date of creation as about 4000BC) which regards history as the events subsequent to the landing of Norman William, with his select body of Jews, in AD1066, enables the statement that "Christopher Columbus discovered America at the end of the fifteenth century" to be accepted as accurate. Apart from the fact that Columbus never saw America, the mainland of which was "discovered" by John Cabot, who sailed from Bristol in 1497, there is strong reason to believe that various Scandinavian peoples had fairly constant intercourse with the North American Continent hundreds, if not thousands, of years earlier. Their traditional name for it was Markland.
There are however, certain features in regard to the rediscovery of America which are worth attention. Christopher Columbus was a Jew, and John Cabot, although his ship and crew were English, was a Venetian. (Venice was taken over by the Khazars around the eleventh century AD – Ed). But the extraordinary and significant fact is that there was in Bristol at that time a secret Jewish community "who handed on their tradition by word of mouth" (Lord Melchett: Thy Neighbour, p. 90).
It is obvious that both Columbus and Cabot had information of a fairly definite character to guide them. Both of them set a compass course which was approximately correct. And both of them had connections with banking—Columbus with Jewish banking and Cabot with the banking City-State of Venice, and almost certainly with this secret Bristol Jewry. The essence of banking has always been what in military circles is call 'intelligence'—information in its widest sense, spying being an important component, and it seems highly probable that the existence of the American continent was known in banking circles when it was quite unknown outside them. If this was so, it is reasonable to assume that when action was taken in regard to this knowledge it was considered action.
Quite a different type of individual is required to pioneer a new country from that required to develop it subsequently, and it is not without significance also that the original British settlers were followed by a wave of Dutch, who for the most part remained on the Atlantic seaboard as traders and bankers. One of the real effects of the American War of Independence was that although a facade of the original settlers of British stock held most of the titular offices of Government, the control of development and policy rapidly passed to a tiny Dutch minority (not to be confused with the much larger German element frequently called Dutch in the United States by a corruption of the word Deutsch). Such names as Roosevelt, Astor, Vanderbilt, Van Rensselaer, Van Cortlandt, etc., immediately occur to anyone in this connection. The Dutch [Jews] were the Chosen Instrument of Finance.
This is not an attempt to write a history of the United States. It is a suggestion that the United States is a definite and very important item in a plan which was interrupted by the expulsion from England in the late thirteenth and early fourteenth centuries of the Jews and their associates whom we now call Freemasons, but who were then called Knights Templars. [Roman Catholicism is a covert branch of Cabalistic Judaism organized at the First Nicea Council in AD325 for the purpose of subverting Christianity. Later Merovingian (Edomite) Jews would control the papacy and their prince Charles I would become Charlemagne, emperor of the Holy Roman Empire, terminating the Merovingian kingdom. The Merovingian Templars became the Jewish banksters of Europe, a powerful network with international influence: "Pope Innocent II, a former protégé of Saint Bernard, issued a papal bull in 1139, which stated that the Templars owed no allegiance to any secular or ecclesiastical power other than the Pope himself. In this way, the Templars were rendered totally independent of all kings, princes, and prelates, and from all interference from both political and religious authorities. They became, in effect, a law unto themselves. At the same time, Europe’s younger sons of noble families flocked to enroll in the order’s ranks and vast donations—in money, goods, and land—were made from every quarter of Christendom. Eventually, the Templars became so wealthy that they could lend vast sums of money to destitute monarchs and became the international bankers for thrones in Europe and certain Muslim potentates in the Middle East" (Library of Halexandria – Ed)].
By common consent, the real framer of the Declaration of Independence was Thomas Jefferson. Jefferson's mother was a Randolph—probably with the Lees of Virginia, the most aristocratic family of the New World. There is quite indisputable evidence that Jefferson was an international Freemason, and that the revolutionary elements in America, who were greatly in the minority, were the same elements who were fomenting trouble in France (Jefferson was actually United States Ambassador to France at the time of the fall of the Bastille).
The famous phrase "Life, Liberty and the pursuit of happiness" originally read "Every man is entitled to the possession of life, liberty and property", and Jefferson in person struck out "property" and inserted the quite meaningless abstraction "the pursuit of happiness".
[Perhaps it now becomes clearer why "the right to strike," i.e. the right to contract-out, is eliminated from the New Orders. It is, precisely, the dividing line between slavery and Freedom, and was first denied by the Trades Unions. We are, in fact, reverting to chattel slavery because of the breakdown of wage-slavery and it is recognised that the slaves must be well fed and looked after, because they are property. And it will be remembered that no slave could own property, because it would enable him to contract-out, so, for the slaves, property must be abolished, i.e. "nationalised." (The planned monetary and economic "meltdown" of the moment is the collectivization of power wherein corporate and individual independence is nationalised, amalgamated or otherwise eliminated in the transition to serfdom and Lucifer's totalitarian one world government, Satan's Eden – Ed)].
Jefferson was almost a perfect example of the aristocratic abstractionist—the man who is born with a power complex which he inherits, who disdains apprenticeship to his constitution-making. He was a student and a lawyer from the age of seventeen: nearly every one of his policies was in direct conflict with his own mode of life and fundamental sympathies, and conveys the suggestion of outside influence on inexperience. Although he was President (a very different office to that now attached to the title) and is credited with the Louisiana Purchase, the picture presented of his Administration is that of a man with an inherited aptitude for dealing with large matters, but taking his instructions on them without much consciousness of the reality they embody.
Perhaps the most indisputable evidence that I am not unduly fanciful in this matter is provided by the Great Seal of the United States, which was the work of Jefferson, John Adams, and Benjamin Franklin, all Freemasons, the obverse of which consists of a truncated pyramid with the headstone bearing a picture of the All-Seeing Eye, the symbol of Freemasonry, suspended about the Pyramid. The motto is "annuit coeptis"—"he prospers our origins" (or "undertakings").
The pyramid is the symbol of world government. The rest of the symbolism is obvious. Seen in the light of this clue, the history of the United States is consistently bound up with Whiggism, Lutheranism, Calvinism, and with the "mergers," financial buccaneering, and political corruption of the super-capitalism which accompany Judaeo-Masonry. The political corruption is not adventitious—it is essential. The type of Government, and the type of legislator in the main prevalent in Britain during the last half of the Victorian era, although very far from ideal, would never have tolerated for a week the financial piracy of the Vanderbilt-Harriman era which co-existed with it in the United States. It is not brains of which the Plotters are afraid—it is integrity. This type of British Government was definitely one of tradition, not of expediency, and traditional Government imposes certain standards in much the same way that a Gothic Cathedral discourages ribaldry.
In 1935, a year which probably marked the disappearance of any real prospect of peace, the Secretary of the US Treasury announced that in future the obverse of the Great Seal would be printed on the back of all US paper money.
I should like to emphasize, for the benefit of those to whom it is necessary, that not only is the mass of the modern American people unconscious of the part it has been billed to play, but is very uneasy as to its part in world affairs.
Whether leading American statesmen understand the situation is also not plain. I rather doubt it. But that there is a small inner ring which does, I am confident I have met at least one of them.
One of our nineteenth century statesmen begged Englishmen to cultivate the habit of studying large maps. With a world war on our hands, we require above most other things, to realise that evil designs can be, and are built up from innocuous components, and in consequence short views of history may be very deceptive.
Although British professional, trained, diplomats, like British Generals, are all incompetent, ill-informed, and old-school-tie failures, immeasurably inferior both in intelligence and judgement to the staffs of the Daily Worker and its threepenny edition, nevertheless in their unanimity on the German mentality they are supported by so many foreigners that we must reluctantly accept their view. Germans from the time of Frederick the "Great", whether under Monarchies, Republics or National Socialism, have, as a people, part of them actively, and the rest of them passively, accepted war as the primary national industry.
Now, so-called democracy is definitely pacifist and strongly pro-German, while Socialism both in Russia and Germany is strongly militarist. The pseudo-democracy of Great Britain or the United States views war with weary distaste and is not easily persuaded to retain sufficient armed strength to enable his diplomats to make their voices heard.
I believe that I am stating an ascertained and incontestable fact when I say that Germany, Great Britain and the United States, beyond any other great powers, have been at all significant times dictated to, in matters of policy, by Jews, and predominantly by German Jews. Although, for instance, (Germanophobe "minister of hate" – Ed) Lord Vansittart is most careful not to attribute German policy to Jewish control, the point that he makes, which is that there is no change in German policy during the past century; that it has been and is consistent, amounts to saying that it has always been Jewish, because we know, beyond peradventure, that during the period in which it was most obvious, the period of Bismarck and Wilhelm II, it was moulded and organised by such men as Rathenau, Ballin, Bleichroeder and others, all Jews. It should be observed that there was during this period a facade of violent anti-Judaism in Germany of about the same effective value as that professed by the National Socialist Administration. [The world is not supposed to not know that the Emancipation Edict of 1822 guaranteed Jews in Germany all civil rights enjoyed by Germans – Ed]. Practically covering the whole of this period, the German-Jew, Sir Ernest Cassel, was probably the most powerful single individual in Great Britain, and his opposite number and correspondent, Jacob Schiff, the patron of Presidents in America. If anyone is naive enough to suppose that these people knew nothing of the underlying policy of each other, then I would ask him to consider the fact that the chief financial advisers at the Peace Conference in 1919, representing both the 'victors' and the defeated, were all cousins, all Jews, and all connected with one German-Jew bank in New York.
As [Jewish] Premier Stalin said (and we had better take notice) "Hitlers come and Hitlers go, but the German people and the German State remain." He made it clear that he intended them to remain, more or less as they are.
It must surely be obvious that if you have a single effective control over three ostensibly independent nations, and in one of them you exalt militarism to the status of a religion, and in the other two you finance pacifism, together with adulation of the militarist nation (it sounds impossible, but it has been, and is being, done) you cannot conceivably have any primary policy but one. You desire war. Since war in itself is, to put it conservatively, disagreeable, you obviously do not intend to take part in it, but to use it to further conditions satisfactory to you.
If the Germans are to be credited with elementary intelligence, they must see that nothing could ensure the safety of the Jews so effectively in a European War as a ferocious display of anti-Semitism (I use this misused word advisedly in this instance). It immediately establishes the "persecuted" as non-combatants; it provides a mass of "refugees", many of whom are perfect spies and propagandists, and it puts them in the well-known position of backing every horse in the race. I am completely agnostic as to the extent of genuine barbarity by Germans to Jews. Some of the atrocity stories, such as the use of Jewish babies as footballs, are merely idiotic. But even if I were convinced that it is considerable in extent, my comment would be that it is not a tithe of the suffering endured by the fighting troops, and is an example of using an army, not without loss, but with a minimum of loss, and the minimum of risk of final defeat. I am convinced that the Jewish High Command desires the ultimate victory of Germany, and will fight tooth-and-nail, not to end the war, but to see that Germany is not defeated in the peace.
That, alone, is a sufficient reason for the complete defeat of Germany.
Since Great Britain is, and always has been, the great obstacle to the Big Idea, it is obvious that however much of the fighting is done by her, and however much (and the more the better) her loss and damage, she is to return, like the butler in Barrie's play "The Admiral Crichton", to that self-effacing hush which is supposed to be becoming to the good. (Anyway, General Eisenhower won the North African campaign, didn't he!) The Armistice period [between World Wars II, and III – Ed.] is incomprehensible other than as a well arranged plan to emasculate and demoralise this country and its people.
It do not wish to be misunderstood. I do not believe that in the consummation of the Great Plan, the Germans would fare very much better than anyone else. But it appears evident that the Germans are the ideal people to do the dirty work antecedent to the coming of the New Jerusalem, and are already "air conditioned" [by the bombing of Berlin, Hamburg, and later genocidal incendiary blanket bombing of Dresden in 1945 when Germany was already a defeated people] to hand over the reins of power at a suitable moment. (And we know the German-Roman Empire will rule to the consummation – Ed). . .
A Chosen People is a collectivity bound together by a myth, and the less intelligent the individual the more likely he is to be the slave of a myth. The Jews, for instance, are not in the main intelligent. No body of individuals which was intelligent would have repeated its mistakes as the Jews have repeated, and are repeating theirs. An in-bred race is peculiarly susceptible to hypnotism, i.e. domination by a myth.
The relation of an individual to a myth is important, and is well illustrated by Hans Christian Anderson's charming little fable of the King who had no clothes on. The conventions and laws which grow up round, and buttress, a myth may persist, in the manner in which the sanction of the money myth persists, but they are in mortal danger when a child sees through them, and says so. "Nothing is so dangerous as initiative".
If we substitute the word "ruling" for "chosen", and realise that various peoples, including our own, have presented a facade of being the "ruling" race for just so long as they have been the passive tools of the money power, it is not difficult to see that, once the myth gets out of hand, wars and yet more wars are inevitable. After draining and pillaging one country after another, the international money power, the wandering Jew, has in the past left bemused or subsidised historians to explain that, like the rise and fall of the Roman Empire (almost completely a monetary phenomenon due to 'silver inflation'), all nations have their day, and that prosperity is bad for them. Several children have seen through this story, with the result that old contestants for the limelight are unwilling to retire into the wings and a virtuous poverty. We have only to compare the remark of General Ludendorff, which I have quoted elsewhere, that "The majority of the English do not realise that, having done their duty by the inner Jewish circle, they have now got to disappear as a world Power" (The Coming War, 1931, Faber and Faber) with that of Mr. Winston Churchill, which has been so coldly received in America, "I did not become His Majesty's First Minister to preside over the dissolution of the British Empire," to see that the meek acceptance of the decrees of fate is somewhat marred by the realisation that fate is a lady of easy virtue, always to be found and acquired where the pickings are good.
(We now come to the consummation of the Big Idea, to the "pickings" of the productive carcass of the United States and the world. Just after World War II the late Eric Butler wrote, "as a result of the Pacific War, China is being 'developed' and 'modernised' by huge loans from Jewish financiers in America, working in close collaboration with their financial allies, the Soong family, which was educated in America. . . There is little doubt that China, with her teeming millions and largely unexploited resources, is ideal for the Jewish-inspired planners to build up into a powerful force in world affairs. The last has not been heard of China".
At the Melbourne World Economic Forum in September 2000, On Target (20/10/00) carried a press report on the remarks of Mr David Tang, Shanghai Tung chairman, who was unusually frank about the implications of free trade. He told those assembled:
". . . I wouldn't concentrate on the rest of the world's companies selling to Asia. I would watch out, if I were you, about the WTO," he said. . . "I've never understood why you want to engage us—we've got fantastically low labour [costs]" he told the forum. "China's going to completely devastate your whole labour force. They have labour costs 15 times, 30 times lower than America . . . All the stuff you're going to make, we're going to completely destroy in terms of costs" he said. "We can make things so much more cheaply than you. I would watch out for your markets being infiltrated by us . . ." We have been 'herded into' the next phase of the World War Order [by treacherous politicians and Mammonite businessmen beguiled by agencies of 'the City' such as the RIIA, CFR, Fabian Society, Trilateral Commission, Bilderbergers, and so on].
Under the heading "Universal War," Protocol 7 states: "The intensification of armaments, the increase of police forces—are all essential for the completion of the aforementioned plans [for one world government]. What we have to get at is that there should be in all the States of the world, besides ourselves, only the masses of the proletariat, a few millionaires devoted to our interests, police and soldiers." [World depopulation].
"Throughout all Europe, and by means of relations with Europe, in other continents also, we must create ferments, discords and hostility. Therein we gain a double advantage. In the first place we keep in check all countries, for they will know that we have the power whenever we like to create disorders or to restore order. All these countries are accustomed to see in us an indispensable force of coercion. In the second place, by our intrigues we shall tangle up all the threads which we have stretched into the cabinets of all States by means of the political, by economic treaties, or loan obligations. In order to succeed in this we must use great cunning and penetration during negotiations and agreements, but, as regards what is called the "official language," we shall keep to the opposite tactics and assume the mask of honesty and complacency. In this way the peoples and governments of the goyim, whom we have taught to look only at the outside whatever we present to their notice, will still continue to accept us as the benefactors and saviours of the human race".
"We must be in a position to respond to every act of opposition by war with the neighbors of that country which dares to oppose us: but if these neighbors should also venture to stand collectively together against us, then we must offer resistance by a universal war. The principal factor of success in the political is the secrecy of its undertakings: the word should not agree with the deeds of the diplomat" ["By Way of Deception Thou shalt make War"].
"We must compel the governments of the goyim to take action in the direction favored by our widely conceived plan, already approaching the desired consummation, by what we shall represent as public opinion, secretly promoted by us through the means of that so-called "Great Power"—the press, which, with a few exceptions that may be disregarded, is already entirely in our hands".
"In a word, to sum up our system of keeping the governments of the goyim in Europe in check, we shall show our strength to one of them by terrorist attempts and to all, if we allow the possibility of a general rising against us, we shall respond with the guns of America or China or Japan".
Speaking before the United States Senate on February 17, 1950, James Paul Warburg, whose family were co-founders of Rothschild's Federal Reserve and Council on Foreign Relations declared: "We shall have World Government, whether or not we like it. The only question is whether World Government will be achieved by conquest or consent".
"So you see, my dear Conningsby, the world is governed by very different personages from what is imagined by those who are not behind the scenes" (Benjamin Disraeli, Conningsby).
The Big Idea behind the Great Plan had its genesis in the "original sin" in the garden of Eden when Lucifer incarnate the Serpent to seduce Eve who bore his vicarious son Cain. Genesis 3:15, "God set enmity between Serpent and the woman, and between his natural seed in Cain, and his spiritual seed who follow hybrid religion, and the natural seed of the first Adam and the Spiritual seed of the last Adam, Jesus Christ."
Jesus Messiah said to some of Cain's descendants, "You serpents, you race of vipers, how can you escape the damnation of hell? Therefore, take notice: I will send you prophets and wise men and scribes, some of whom you will kill and crucify, and some you will scourge in your synagogues and persecute from town to town, so that you will become guilty of all the righteous blood shed upon the earth, from the blood of righteous Abel to the blood of Zechariah son of Barachiah, whom you murdered between the temple and the altar" (Matthew 23:33-35).
God never changes His Word or His ways, and while Satan's word is quite ambidextrous, he never changes his ways. Like Satan, the mark of his children is that they always work under another name and in a different occupation "lest whoever identifies them will kill them" (Genesis 4:14-15).
The Big Idea was and is Lucifer's Great Plan to usurp Michael's kingdom by overwhelming power behind law as reflected in the Babylonian Talmud, U.C.C., Rothschild's B.A.R., the U.N., Communism, Vatican, W.C.C., that enable actions such as George II's unprovoked genocidal nuclear aggression against Afghanistan and Iraq, backed by other puppet and occupied states of the empire of the City of London, such as Britain, Australia, Holland, Japan and Germany.
"Quia fecit per aliam, fecif per se"—He who does it through another, does it himself. Hence "God visits the iniquity of the fathers upon the children to the third and fourth generation of them that hate Him" (Exodus 20:5). Yet for an election of true believers in Adam's race He has provided a substitute to suffer the penalty for their sins and iniquities in His own flesh and to carry them far away—a near kinsman Redeemer typed by the two goats offered for Israel on the Day of Atonement (Leviticus 16:5-10).
Primary intention is the essence of crime. There is, of course, the accessory before and after the fact, and this is The Programme for the Third World War. But remove the planner, the instigator, and there will be no crime. "In that day there will be no more Canaanite in the house of the Lord of hosts" (Zechariah 14:21; Revelation 21:27; 22:15). nl554.htm
Pass it on . . . please send this article to someone you know
Brother Grigor-Scott is a non-denominational minister who has ministered full-time since 1981, primarily to other ministers and their congregations in other countries. He pastors Bible Believers' tiny congregation, and is available to teach in your church.
For Further Information Contact:
Bible Believers' Church
Currabubula, NSW 2342, Australia
|
|
|
October 29, 2008 – The swindle of American taxpayers is proceeding more or less in broad daylight, as the unwitting voters are preoccupied with the national election. Treasury Secretary Hank Paulson agreed to invest $125 billion in the nine largest banks, including $10 billion for Goldman Sachs, his old firm. But, if you look more closely at Paulson's transaction, the taxpayers were taken for a ride—a very expensive ride. They paid $125 billion for bank stock that a private investor could purchase for $62.5 billion. That means half of the public's money was a straight-out gift to Wall Street, for which taxpayers got nothing in return. . . The financiers at Treasury probably assume any public outrage will be lost in the election returns. I hope they are mistaken. Full story: 