SAY NO TO A NUCLEAR AUSTRALIA

Controversy as FutureGen Plans are Cancelled.

6:33 AM, Thu 28 Feb 2008 .. Posted in Conspiracy Theories .. 0 comments .. Link
Plans for FutureGen, a near zero emission coal fired power plant planned for Mattoon Township, Coles County, Illinois was cancelled by the Department of Energy (U.S.A) on Janurary 29 2008, among much controversy. The DOE announced that it would pull its funding for the project, after concerns of costs rising to higher than expected levels. However, some Illinois local and state officials have experessed frustration over the time and resources wasted by the state in competing for the FutureGen contract, and have questioned why the decision was made after the Illionois site was chosen over one in Texas.

Mattoon mayor David Cline said "one could question the motivation of the Department of Energy which was ready to move forward with the project until a site other than Texas was chosen." Illinois senator Dick Durban claimed that "when the city of Mattoon, Illinois, was chosen over possible locations in Texas, the secretary of energy set out to kill FutureGen."

Samuel W Bodman, U.S. Energy Secretary however, has countered these claims, explaining that that the restructuring of the FutureGen project will "equip multiple new clean-coal power plants with advanced CCS technology, instead of one demonstration plant. That will provide more electricity from multiple clean-coal plants, sequestering at least twice as much CO2 and providing for wider use and more rapid commercialization."

The move is likely to delay the project as other members seek the additional funds that the DOE was to provide. Despite the cancellation of funding by the DOE, the FutureGen Alliance continues to move forward with the project, opening an office in Mattoon and planning to buy the land for the plant in August 2008, in partnership with a local group.

According to the New York Times in an article dated January 31, 2008...
"The Energy Department on Wednesday canceled its main program for demonstrating how to use coal without adding to global warming, saying the project needed an overhaul to rein in soaring costs. The announcement ends a program started four years ago and described at the time as “one of the boldest steps our nation has taken toward a pollution-free energy future.” The program, called FutureGen, was also intended to provide hydrogen for fuel-cell cars and other uses. But the estimated cost has risen to about $1.8 billion from $1 billion, and officials feared it would increase. The department said it would start over with a new program, but that is unlikely to happen before the Bush administration leaves office."

According to an article on CNet News.com, February 1, 2008...
" The FutureGen Alliance, which includes companies like Foundation Coal and Peabody Energy, says that the DOE initially agreed to contribute $800 million to the project. The DOE's share has only risen to $1.1 billion. Alliance members have also agreed to provide the DOE partial or full repayment for overruns. "The cost is manageable," the organization read. The DOE also claimed that financing such a project was inappropriate. Hardly, said the Alliance. Power plants are always financed. It also disputed the DOE's claim that the plant wouldn't be commercially viable. Not so, says the Alliance. Finally, the DOE claimed that the new projects will sequester as much carbon dioxide at a lower cost than FutureGen. "The Mattoon site as currently configured can sequester approximately 2 million tons per year," the Alliance said. The new projects aim for 1 million tons a year--or half as much. Whoever is right, the dispute seems to add to the Department of Energy's (or at least the Department as it has been configured for the last couple of years) inability to keep its mind on research. In the '90s, it kicked off an ambitious program to build hybrid cars. Japanese manufacturers weren't invited. In response, Toyota and Honda released hybrids. The DOE program was canceled. It then shifted to developing a hydrogen economy. We're still waiting on that one."

A report from the Washington Post, dated February 16, 2008 states...
"President Bush announced in 2004 and then continually promoted a public-private venture he hoped would usher in an era of clean coal and be a cornerstone of U.S. efforts to address global warming. The FutureGen plant would have created electricity by stripping coal of harmful carbon dioxide and pumping the gas underground. The result would be power generation with zero greenhouse gas emissions. In December, Matoon Ill., was selected as the site for the coal plant. And then, on Jan. 30, Energy secretary, Samuel W Bodman pulled the plug."

Personally, I believe that one should wonder about the motives for such a move. Texas is the home state of President Bush, after all. But even if it is all about money, shouldn't the $50 million US that the state of Illinois has already sunk into the project bear some consideration. $40 million of this came from US taxpayers, and is now just wasted funds. Why scrap the project for someone else to take up when such a large amount has already been invested, especially when the government was so much in favour of the project initially? It doesn't really make sense.
Leave a Comment

{ Last Page } { Page 9 of 21 } { Next Page }

Do We Want This?

Here is a place where we
can discuss the current
nuclear power debate
in Australia.
A place to voice our
concerns and discuss
alternative sources.
The content of this blog
will periodically be sent
to our leaders in Canberra.
Please feel free to make
comment on the issues
raised for discussion here.
They need to know
just how we feel.

Home
Archives

Interesting Reading

Greenpeace - Aust/Pacific
Greenpeace International - End the Nuclear Age
The Australian Wilderness Society
Nuclear Age Peace Foundation
CSIRO Energy Research
TreeHugger
Real Climate
Change.org
Green Options
Matter Network
AGO- Map of Renewable Energy Generators

Categories

Anti Nuclear Sentiments
Clean Coal
Conspiracy Theories
Geothermal
Greenpeace Wisdom
Hydro
Natural Gas
Solar
Technology of Today
The Human Side
Thermal
Wind

Recent Entries

Transportation Has Come a Long Way.
Shell Withdraws from the London Array Wind Farm.
Wind Power is Big Business
Solar Thermal Energy
Can We Rely on Renewable Energy?
Cloncurry to get a Solar Thermal Tower
Coal Seam Methane Extraction
Links to Current Research
Controversy as FutureGen Plans are Cancelled.
Sustainable Houses.
PM's Nuclear Plant Denial
Some answers, maybe?
Alternative Energy Sources... Clean Coal
Thanks to Snowy.
Interesting Reading.
Altrnative Energy Sources... Geothermal
Conspiracy Theories... A Nuclear State
A little background music, please.
The Need To Know
Remember Chernobyl... April 26, 1986.
66% of surveyed Australians DO NOT want nuclear power. WHY ARE WE STILL HAVING THIS DEBATE?